正方第三位同学发言，时间三分钟。

   孔老夫子孜孜不倦，因为他是个勤于灌溉善根的人。对方辩友，大家好！我想请问对方辩友，今天提出了这么多，如果说人性真的是本恶的，我们来请问下面几个问题：如果说呀，驯兽师可以改变狮子的本性的话，那么我们想想看，我们可以教狮子敬礼，也可以教狮子行善吗？我再想请问对方辩友，如果说今天是人性本恶的话，对方辩友说的种种教育，那可能实行吗？谁会信任谁，由哪一个性善的人来教，还是性恶的人来教呢？如果说性恶的人来教的话，那谁会服谁呢？他教的凭什么就是善的呢？今天对方辩友最根本的关键的矛盾错误就在于说，他相信人性本恶，但本恶的人会摒弃恶的价值吗？本恶的人会喜欢恶吧 ，他讨厌的是什么呢？讨厌的是某一个人加在他身上的恶行。所以说，本恶的人应当是非常快乐地去行恶才对，他最讨厌、难过的是别人的恶加在他身上才对。所以说，今天对方辩友在这样的错误矛盾之下，怎么能告诉我们说，人性本恶的，但人又会摒弃恶的价值呢？既然人性本恶，人就会欢欢喜喜地接受恶的价值。今天说啊，人性有两层，一种是自然属性，是天性，再一种是社会属性，那种是后天的。自然属性就是说人的天性就跟动物一样，有欲望的本能。人的社会属性，为什么就是后天的，不是本性？人的社会属性就是说人可以被教，人有善根，人有善端，那这不就是人的本性了？对方辩友，如果说今天本性可以移来移去，从恶换到善，从善换到恶，那我想请问，本来的性到底是什么？如果对方辩友说今天坚信，历史演进过程当中都是往恶的方向移动的话，我方今天没有话说。今天就在于说，整个历史过程都是往善的去移动，所以我们相信，对方辩友也相信，该往善的方向去移动，可是谁会相信，社会该往善的方向去移动呢？是那些本恶的人吗？如果说对方辩友真的坚信本恶的话，那我就要称赞对方辩友一句：你是泯灭天性，没有天良的人了！因为那就是您顺性而为，顺乎自然，应乎天理，顺乎人心了吗？所以，我们再来想想看，如果说我们建立起来一个本恶的世界的话，我们的社会会是怎么样？相信我，我们在这里谈，不是谈输赢，是谈真理。如果说人性本恶，我们彼此无法信任。你坐在那里，我坐在这里，我们彼此有什么样的语言可以进行沟通。因为你会怀疑我，我会猜忌你，如果没有本，如果没有善良的端行，没有善良种子，我们怎么在这里进行流畅的沟通呢？在这里，我方要一再地强调的是说，今天对方辩友，如果今天相信人性本恶的话，就不会有我们这群和善的人群了。

Confucius tirelessly, as he is eager to irrigation roots people. Friends argue the other side, everyone! I would like to ask you the other side argue that today so many that if humanity is really the evil, we have to ask the following questions : If you see that the Lions can change the nature of the circus, then we come to think of it, We salute the Lions can teach, can teach Lions charity? I would like to ask you argue the other side, if this is by nature evil, the other Friends argue that the various educational, it might be put into effect? Who will trust anybody, by any one person to teach Human Nature is Good or evil people to teach? If evil people to the religion, then who will be serving whom? He taught what is good? Friends argue the other side today, the most fundamental error is the key to the contradiction that he believed that the evil of humanity. But the people will reject this evil evil values? Nobody likes the evil evil bars, he is hated? Canada is a personal dislike of evil in his possession. Therefore, the evil people should be very happy to go Caidui evil, he hates the most. The sad part is that he only added to the other's evil. Therefore, in such a mistake today, the other Friends of dialectical contradictions, how can tell us that the evil of humanity. But people will reject evil values? Since the human evil, evil people will be happy to accept the value. Humanity has two, a natural attribute of nature, and a social nature, which is the day after tomorrow. Natural attribute of human nature is just as animals, the desire by instinct. Man's social nature, why is acquired, not nature? Attributes to say that the community can be, or have roots that have good end, it is not that human nature? Friends argue the other side, if this nature can be changed to remove from the exchange of good and evil, for the good of evil, I would like to ask, Originally sex in the end what is it? Friends say that if the debate convinced that the process of historical evolution and evil are heading in the direction of the movement, not our words today. Today is that the whole historical process is to move to the good, we believe that the other side also believe you argue, moving in the direction to the good, but who would believe that the good direction to go mobile? Who is this evil? If you argue that the other side is really convinced of the evil, then I must commend you argue the other side : You are destroying nature sentence, No scoundrels who! That is because with the job for you, the course of nature, between nature and in accord with the people? So, let us think about that, if we have built up a world of this evil, our society be like? Believe me, we are here to talk, not about winning or losing, is about the truth. If this evil human nature, we can not trust each other. You sit there, I sat here, we have, what kind of language can communicate. I doubt you will, I suspect that you will, in the absence of the, if not good behavior, not good seeds here are fluent in how we communicate? Here, we have to stress again is that you argue the other side today, if I believe in the humanity of this evil, there will be good for us and the crowd.