首先将由正方一辩同学表明立场和发言，时间为三分钟

大家好！哲学家康德主张，人不分聪明才智、贫富美丑都具有理性。孟子认为人性本善，所以进一步又加了一句，每个人都有恻隐之心。而佛家说，一心迷是真身，一心觉则是佛。正因为人性本善，所以人随时随地都可以放下屠刀、立地成佛。我方主张人性本善，就是主张人性的根源点是善的，有善端才会有善行。我方不否认在人类社会中存在有恶行，但是恶行的产生则是由外在环境所造成，所以恶是结果而不是原因。如果硬要说恶是因不是果，也就是说人性本恶，那么人世间根本不能产生真正的道德。虽然英国哲学家霍布斯极力主张在人性本恶的前提下人类可以形成道德。但是想想看，如果人性本恶，人类一切道德规范都是作为人类最大的利己手段。当道德成为手段时，道德还是道德吗？也就是说，人一旦违犯道德而不会受到处罚，人就不会遵守道德的约束了。深夜两点我走在道路上看到红灯，如果人性本恶我就会闯过去，因为不过是为了个人方便。但事实上并不是如此，仍然有许多人遵守交通规则。而根据人性本恶的前提假设，霍布斯认为必须有一个绝对的、无所不在的权威监督每个人履行道德规约。如果人性本恶，没有一个人会心甘情愿地遵守道德规约，但是事实证明：人还是有善行、人还是有道德、还是有利他的行为。如果人性本恶，那么我们只有两种选择：第一个是活在一个“老大哥”无时不刻不监督我们的世界当中；第二个是我们人类社会将是彼此不再相信。如果这样的话，我就会看到一个老太太跌倒了有人把她扶起来，人们则说他居心不良；而我们在辩论会中建立起来的友谊都是虚假的装腔作势。但是我们会发现，在人类历史社会当中，没有一个绝对权威的君主曾经产生过，但是舍己为人的事情在不断地发生。而在生活当中，为善不为人知的生徒小民更是比比皆是。泰丽莎修女的善行，大乘佛教中所说的“众生永远不得渡，则已终身不作佛”的慈悲宏愿，难道不正是人性本善的最佳引证吗？

Good morning. Philosopher Kant's proposal, irrespective of talent, beauty and ugliness are rational wealth. Mencius that human nature is good, so also further added that everyone has compassion. And the Buddhists say, as one fan who is really bringing Cox is the Buddha. That is basically good, people can at any time annihilation and abjectness good deeds. We advocate the inherent goodness of human nature is the source advocates is good, they should have only good end. We do not deny that there is evil in human society, but evil is arising from the external environment as a result, So evil is the result, not the cause. If we say that evil is not, to say the evil of humanity, the human world can have a real moral. Although the British philosopher Hobbes strongly advocate that the evil in human nature can be formed under the premise of human moral. But come to think of it, if the evil of human nature, all human ethics are the most selfish human being means. When the means to be moral, ethical or moral? In other words, if the person is not violating the ethics punished, and they will not comply with the ethical constraints. 2:00 night I saw the red light go on the road, if I would have to force their way through evil by nature, but for personal convenience. But the fact is not the case, there are still many people to abide by traffic regulations. According to the hypothesis of evil by nature, Hobbes think there should be an absolute. pervasive moral authority supervise every performance of the Statute. If the evil of human nature, no one will be willing to comply with the ethics statute, but the facts prove that people still have : good deeds people still have morals, or enabling his behavior. If the evil of humanity, then we have only two options : The first one is to live in a "Big Brother" has kept the world we do not supervise them; The second is that we no longer believe in human society is mutual. If so, I will see an old lady fell Batafu people, ill people, he said. in the debate and we are building up a false show of friendship. However, we will find that the society in human history, no one has absolute authority of the monarchy have, But the things that keep the incident occurred. In life, unknown to improve pupils Wise can be seen everywhere. Theresa Sisters of Charity Walk, Mahayana Buddhism says, "the people shall never be crossing, life will not have been Buddha" compassionate vision Is it not the best quote basically good? Thank you。